In Arizona's extreme climate, reflective roof coatings have become essential for reducing building heat gain, lowering energy costs, and extending roof longevity. Two leading options—silicone and elastomeric coatings—offer compelling benefits but with distinct performance characteristics. Understanding these differences helps property owners select the optimal solution for their specific needs.
Both coating types provide excellent "cool roof" performance, but with different characteristics:
Silicone coatings deliver superior long-term reflectivity retention in Arizona's harsh conditions. They maintain initial solar reflectance of 0.70-0.88 (70-88%) with minimal degradation over time, even without regular cleaning. Their thermal emittance typically ranges from 0.85-0.90, resulting in Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) values of 96-110.
Silicone's inorganic composition resists UV degradation, maintaining reflective properties for 10-15 years before recoating becomes necessary. The material naturally resists dirt accumulation and maintains reflectivity even as surface dust builds up between cleanings.
Elastomeric acrylic coatings provide excellent initial reflectivity of 0.75-0.87 (75-87%) with thermal emittance of 0.88-0.91, yielding SRI values of 94-108. However, they typically experience more significant reflectivity degradation over time in Arizona conditions.
Without regular cleaning, elastomeric coatings may lose 15-25% of their reflective properties within 3-5 years due to dirt accumulation and surface degradation. Their organic composition makes them more susceptible to UV damage, requiring more frequent maintenance to maintain optimal performance.
The extreme conditions in Arizona create specific durability challenges that differentiate these coating systems:
Silicone offers exceptional weathering resistance in Arizona's high-UV environment with minimal degradation from sun exposure. It maintains flexibility throughout its lifespan with elongation properties of 150-350% that accommodate building movement during extreme temperature fluctuations.
These coatings provide excellent ponding water resistance—critical during monsoon season—and can withstand continuous water exposure without deteriorating. Their typical service life reaches 15-25 years with proper application and maintenance requirements.
Silicone's inorganic composition resists microbial growth even during humid monsoon periods and offers excellent chemical resistance to atmospheric pollutants and bird droppings. The material provides good impact resistance against hail and wind-driven debris common during storm seasons.
Elastomeric coatings offer good initial flexibility with elongation properties of 200-400%, but this flexibility typically decreases over time with UV exposure. They provide moderate ponding water resistance but may deteriorate under continuous water exposure, making proper drainage essential.
Their typical service life ranges from 5-7 years in Arizona conditions, requiring more frequent recoating than silicone alternatives. The organic composition makes them more susceptible to microbial growth during humid periods, potentially requiring biocide treatments.
Elastomeric coatings provide moderate impact resistance when new but become more brittle with age and exposure. They offer good adhesion to most substrates but may experience more significant adhesion loss over time compared to silicone.
Initial and lifecycle costs vary significantly between these systems:
Silicone typically has higher initial material costs at $1.75-3.50 per square foot installed (for standard 20-30 mil application). However, the longer recoating intervals (typically 15+ years) result in lower lifecycle costs for long-term ownership.
These coatings usually require fewer gallons per square for equivalent protection (1.5-2.5 gallons per 100 square feet for 20-30 mils), and their single-coat application reduces labor costs compared to multi-coat systems. Minimal maintenance requirements further reduce long-term expenses.
Elastomeric acrylics offer lower initial costs at $1.25-2.50 per square foot installed (for standard 20-30 mil application). However, more frequent recoating requirements (typically every 7-10 years) increase lifecycle costs for long-term ownership.
These systems typically require more material per square (3 gallons per 100 square feet for 25-30 mils) and usually need multiple coats with appropriate drying time between applications, increasing labor costs. Regular maintenance and cleaning requirements to maintain reflectivity add to long-term expenses.
Installation methods and requirements differ substantially between these coating types:
Silicone coatings typically require single-coat application at 20-30 mils, simplifying the installation process. They cure through moisture reaction rather than evaporation, allowing application in higher humidity conditions common during monsoon season.
These coatings have excellent adhesion to most existing roof substrates with proper preparation and provide rapid resistance to rainfall after application (typically 1-2 hours), reducing weather vulnerability during installation. Their solvent-free formulations (high-solids silicones) minimize odor and VOC concerns.
Elastomeric coatings typically require multiple coats (2-3) at 10-15 mils per coat to achieve desired thickness. They cure through water evaporation, requiring application during dry weather with sufficient drying time between coats.
These coatings provide excellent adhesion to most substrates with proper preparation. Their water-based formulations allow simple cleanup and low odor during application.
Performance varies by substrate and existing roof system:
Silicone coatings provide excellent corrosion protection and adhere well to properly prepared metal surfaces. Their moisture-cure mechanism makes them ideal for metal roof restoration, particularly for complex profiles with numerous fasteners.
Elastomeric coatings offer good metal protection when properly primed and can effectively seal fasteners and seams. Their lower cost makes them attractive for large metal roof projects with shorter ownership horizons.
Silicone coatings represent the industry standard for SPF protection due to their excellent UV resistance and compatibility with foam. Their high vapor permeability allows the foam system to "breathe" while providing weather protection.
Elastomeric coatings are also a great option to be used over SPF, but typically require more frequent recoating to maintain foam protection.
Both coating types offer environmental benefits but with different profiles:
High-solids silicone formulations (>90% solids) provide low VOC content, meeting stringent air quality regulations. Their longer lifespan reduces material consumption and disposal requirements over time, while excellent long-term reflectivity maintains energy efficiency benefits throughout their service life.
Water-based formulations offer very low VOC content and minimal odor during application. They typically use less energy in manufacturing compared to silicone alternatives and remain easier to clean up without solvents during application.
Ongoing maintenance needs differ significantly:
Silicone requires minimal cleaning to maintain reflectivity due to its natural resistance to dirt accumulation and ability to maintain performance even with some surface contamination. It typically needs inspection every 6-12 months with simple repairs using compatible silicone sealants.
Recoating involves simple cleaning and direct application over existing silicone, typically after 10 years in Arizona conditions.
Elastomeric coatings require regular cleaning (typically every 6-12 months) to maintain optimal reflectivity. They need more frequent inspections to identify cracking or degradation, particularly at seams and transitions.
Recoating typically becomes necessary every 5-7 years in Arizona conditions, requiring thorough cleaning and preparation before application.
For most Arizona commercial and residential applications, silicone coatings typically provide superior long-term performance despite higher initial costs. Their exceptional weathering resistance, ponding water tolerance, and maintained reflectivity make them particularly well-suited to the region's extreme conditions.
Elastomeric acrylic coatings remain appropriate for:
For maximum performance in Arizona's challenging climate, we consider these application guidelines:
When properly selected and applied, both coating types can deliver significant energy savings and roof life extension, with the optimal choice depending on specific project requirements, budget constraints, and performance expectations.